top of page

The Real Reason Riyadh, Doha, and Ankara Fear a Free Iran

  • Feb 20
  • 2 min read

February 20, 2026

By Avi Drori, Senior Contributor


The conventional narrative holds that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey oppose the Islamic Republic out of sectarian rivalry or regional competition. But look closer at the quiet panic spreading through these capitals whenever serious talk of Iranian regime change surfaces, and a different picture emerges — one rooted not in what Iran is, but in what a free Iran could become.

A secular, post-theocratic Iran would be one of the most consequential geopolitical events of this century. With 90 million educated, tech-hungry citizens, vast energy reserves, and a diaspora embedded in Silicon Valley, London, and Toronto, a liberalized Iran would attract a tsunami of foreign investment almost overnight. It would not merely rejoin the global economy — it would reshape the Middle East's economic architecture entirely.

But the development that truly terrifies Riyadh and Ankara is not economic. It is strategic.

A secular Iran has every incentive to align with Israel. The logic is cold and clear: Israel offers access to U.S. political capital, cutting-edge technology, intelligence cooperation, and a proven model of turning a small, resource-limited state into a global innovation powerhouse. Iran, in return, offers scale, geography, energy, and a counterweight to Arab Sunni dominance. The two civilizations — Persian and Jewish — share a long pre-Islamic history of coexistence and mutual respect. The ideological hatred between them is the Islamic Republic's invention, not history's verdict.

An Israeli-Iranian entente — a non-Arab, non-Sunni axis stretching from the Mediterranean to Central Asia — would effectively checkmate both Saudi and Turkish ambitions to lead the broader Muslim world and dominate regional trade and politics. The Abraham Accords already rattled Riyadh. An Iran inside that tent would be an earthquake.

There is also a cultural dimension that goes unspoken in polite diplomatic circles. A prosperous, secular Iran governed by women in boardrooms and parliament would hold up a devastating mirror to the Gulf states and Turkey, where misogyny remains structurally embedded. Iranian women, among the most educated in the region, have been leading the revolt against theocracy at tremendous personal cost. Their success would delegitimize the gender apartheid practiced across Sunni-majority states in ways that a thousand UN resolutions never could.

The opposition to Iranian regime change from Riyadh, Doha, and Ankara is not about stability. It is about self-preservation — the desperate calculus of regimes that understand, better than most Western analysts, exactly what a free and allied Iran would mean for their own grip on power.

They are not afraid of a weak Iran. They are afraid of a strong one.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The End of The Abrahamic Accords?

By Avi Drori, Senior Contributor April 8, 2026 The two-week ceasefire between Washington and Tehran, brokered not by American diplomacy but by Pakistan's Shehbaz Sharif, marks a turning point far more

 
 
 

Comments


Screenshot_20260125_152350_OneDrive.jpg

Drop Me a Line, Let Me Know What You Think

© 2026 by Daily Brief. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page